Gastrointestinal disorders in patients with COVID-19: diagnoses and treatment during the pandemic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22141/2308-2097.55.2.2021.233628Keywords:
COVID-19, Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, rivaroxaban, acetylsalicylic acid, esomeprazole (Ezonexa)Abstract
Background. The pandemic caused by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a topic that is currently in the spotlight of the world community. The use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in combination with new oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban, etc.) and acetylsalicylic acid by the significant number of patients during the pandemic, caused by COVID-19, raises the question about the safety of the influence of each drug on the occurrence of gastrointestinal complications. The development of algorithms to prevent damage to the gastrointestinal mucosa on the background of these drugs is becoming a priority. The purpose was to examine the presence of gastrointestinal disorders using the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) in convalescents after COVID-19 and to evaluate the effectiveness of esomeprazole for correction of these disorders. Materials and methods. We surveyed 92 (48 men and 44 women) convalescents after COVID-19. The mean age of individuals was (49.2 ± 2.0) years. To conduct a survey of patients who had COVID-19, we developed a questionnaire which included patient’s passport data, age, gender. In addition, patients reported how COVID-19 was diagnosed, what drugs they were taking during treatment, and whether they needed oxygen therapy. Subsequently, convalescents after COVID-19 answered questions from the GSRS. Information was collected and the questionnaire was completed by telephone survey. Depending on the data of GSRS, esomeprazole (Ezonexa) was prescribed to patients at a dose of 20 mg 1 time per day, 30 minutes before meals, for 30 days. During the follow-up survey on day 30 of esomeprazole intake, patients re-answered the GSRS questions. Results. Thirty days after starting esomeprazole intake at a dose of 20 mg 1 time per day, 92 convalescents after COVID-19 showed a significant reduction (p < 0.001) in the manifestations of reflux, abdominal pain and dyspeptic syndromes compared to the results before treatment ((2.3 ± 0.1), (4.3 ± 0.2), (5.7 ± 0.3) versus (4.3 ± 0.3), (9.3 ± 0.4), (8.6 ± 0.6), respectively). Esomeprazole was equally effective (p > 0.05) in influencing the severity of reflux, abdominal pain, dyspeptic, diarrheal and constipation syndromes in both men and women: (2.3 ± 0.1), (4.3 ± 0.2), (5.7 ± 0.3), (3.9 ± 0.3), (3.0 ± 0.1) versus (2.4 ± 0.1), (4.2 ± 0.2), (6.0 ± 0.4), (4.0 ± 0.4), (3.1 ± 0.1), respectively. Esomeprazole was also equally effective (p > 0.05) in the impact on the severity of reflux, abdominal pain, dyspeptic, diarrheal and constipation syndromes among patients receiving acetylsalicylic acid and those treated with rivaroxaban: (2.5 ± 0.2), (4.2 ± 0.2), (5.6 ± 0.2), (3.9 ± 0.4), (3.1 ± 0.1) versus (2.2 ± 0.1), (4.4 ± 0.3), (6.4 ± 0.6), (4.2 ± 0.4), (3.0 ± 0.1), respectively. Esomeprazole at a dose of 20 mg 1 time per day was equally effective (p > 0.05) in relation to the dynamics of the severity of syndromes in patients receiving paracetamol and one NSAID and in those receiving paracetamol and 2 NSAIDs. In particular, in people receiving paracetamol and one NSAID, on the background of esomeprazole administration, the severity of reflux, abdominal pain, dyspeptic, diarrheal and constipation syndromes were (2.4 ± 0.1), (4.3 ± 0.2), (5.8 ± 0.3), (4.1 ± 0.3), (3.1 ± 0.1) and in patients taking paracetamol and 2 NSAIDs — (2.1 ± 0.2), (4.5 ± 0.4), (6.7 ± 0.7), (4.4 ± 0.7), (3.0 ± 0.1), respectively. Conclusions. Esomeprazole (Ezonexa) effectively reduces (p < 0.001) the severity of reflux, abdominal pain and dyspeptic syndromes in convalescents after COVID-19. The use of Esomeprazole (Ezonexa) demonstrates the same efficacy (p > 0.05) in men and women when receiving both ASA and rivaroxaban and during the treatment with both paracetamol and one NSAID and paracetamol and 2 NSAIDs.
Downloads
References
Melville NA, Nainggolan L. Are warnings against NSAIDs in COVID-19 warranted? Available from: https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/926940. Accessed: March 17, 2020.
Nasonov EL, Karateev AE. Lesions of the stomach associated with the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Part 1. Klinicheskaya Meditsina. 2003;(3):4-10. (in Russian).
Novik AA, Ionova TI, Shevchenko IuL, authors; Shevchenko IuL, editor. Rukovodstvo po issledovaniiu kachestva zhizni v meditsine [Guidelines for the study of quality of life in medicine]. 2nd ed. Moscow: OLMA Media Grupp; 2007. 320 p. (in Russian).
Redkin AN, Chukardin AV, Brykalina JV, Fontes-Carvalho R. Validation questionnaire GSRS for studying quality of a life at the patients who have transferred abdominal surgical interventions. Rev Port Cardiol. 2010;29(10):1555-1567.
Kolde IaK. Praktikum po teorii veroiatnostei i matematicheskoi statistike [Workshop on probability theory and mathematical statistics]. Moscow: Meditsina; 1991. 157 p. (in Russian).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 I.G. Paliy, S.V. Zaika, I.V. Chernova, I.M. Yevtodii, D.V. Palii

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
ISSN
ISSN 



















